Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/192711 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Papers No. 729
Publisher: 
Statistics Norway, Research Department, Oslo
Abstract: 
Empirical examination of whether R&D subsidies to private firms crowd out private investments has been hampered by problems related to selection. A particular worry is that research intentions and the quality of current research ideas may be correlated with the likelihood of applying for and receiving subsidies. Proposal evaluation data has been put forward as a potential remedy. Using such data from Norway, we do not find strong evidence suggesting that this type of selection creates a severe bias. Proposal evaluation grades strongly predict R&D investments and reduce selection bias in cross-sectional regressions, but there is limited variation in grades within firms over time. This suggests that unobserved project quality is largely absorbed by firm fixed effects. Our best estimate of the short-run additionality of R&D subsidies is 1.15, i.e., a one-unit increase in subsidy increases total R&D expenditure in the recipient firm by somewhat more than a unit. We demonstrate, however, that there is severe measurement error in the subsidy variable. Additionality is therefore likely to be underestimated, and we conclude that measurement errors may be a more important source of bias than selection when panel data are available.
Subjects: 
Technology policy
R&D subsidies
input additionality
selection
proxy variables
JEL: 
O38
O32
L53
H25
H32
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
277.68 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.