Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/190832
Authors: 
Legewie, Joscha
DiPrete, Thomas A.
Year of Publication: 
2014
Citation: 
[Journal:] Sociology of Education [ISSN:] 1939-8573 [Publisher:] Sage Publications [Place:] Thousand Oaks, CA [Volume:] 87 [Year:] 2014 [Issue:] 4 [Pages:] 259-280
Abstract: 
Despite the striking reversal of the gender gap in education, women pursue science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees at much lower rates than those of their male peers. This study extends existing explanations for these gender differences and examines the role of the high school context for plans to major in STEM fields. Building on recent gender theories, we argue that widely shared and hegemonic gender beliefs manifest differently across schools so that the gender-specific formation of study plans is shaped by the local environment of high schools. Using the National Education Longitudinal Study, we first show large variations between high schools in the ability to attract students to STEM fields conditional on a large set of pre–high school measures. Schools that are successful in attracting students to these fields reduce the gender gap by 25 percent or more. As a first step toward understanding what matters about schools, we then estimate the effect of two concrete high school characteristics on plans to major in STEM fields in college—a high school’s curriculum in STEM and gender segregation of extracurricular activities. These factors have a substantial effect on the gender gap in plans to major in STEM: a finding that is reaffirmed in a number of sensitivity analyses. Our focus on the high school context opens concrete avenues for policy intervention and is of central theoretical importance to understand the gender gap in orientations toward STEM fields.
Subjects: 
STEM fields
gender gap
high school context
school curriculum
extracurricular activities
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Additional Information: 
Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich / This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation).
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size
3.09 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.