Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/190370
Autoren: 
Schmidt Iaskio, Emerson Leonardo
Falch, Morten
Shima, Walter Tadahiro
Datum: 
2018
Reihe/Nr.: 
The 22nd Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society: "Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society", June 24th - 27th, 2018, Seoul, Korea
Zusammenfassung: 
Why different groups have different opinions on network neutrality? Can a group impose their opinion to others and have their claims respected by the regulatory authorities? This paper aims to present some insights about the network neutrality regulation in Brazil and discuss the challenges after the FCC's decision in the United States regarding network neutrality. It is hypothesized that there are conflicting groups and that such groups will seek, in the open discussions, to impose their calculation devices. The process of implementation and regulation of the Brazilian Civil Landmark of the Internet is a conflict arena, in which the actors could present their world views and their calculation devices.
Schlagwörter: 
Network neutrality
Regulation
FCC
Dokumentart: 
Conference Paper
Nennungen in sozialen Medien:

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.