Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/189315 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2004
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Queen's Economics Department Working Paper No. 1031
Verlag: 
Queen's University, Department of Economics, Kingston (Ontario)
Zusammenfassung: 
We perform an extensive series of Monte Carlo experiments to compare the performance of two variants of the "Jackknife Instrumental Variables Estimator," or JIVE, with that of the more familiar 2SLS and LIML estimators. We find no evidence to suggest that JIVE should ever be used. It is always more dispersed than 2SLS, often very much so, and it is almost always inferior to LIML in all respects. Interestingly, JIVE seems to perform particularly badly when the instruments are weak.
Schlagwörter: 
two-stage least squares
LIML
JIVE
instrumental variables
weak instruments
JEL: 
C12
C15
C30
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
744.21 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.