Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/18751
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKirchgässner, Gebharden_US
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Tobiasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T15:52:37Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T15:52:37Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/18751-
dc.description.abstractUsing data of Swiss referenda from 1981 to 1999, this paper presents new empirical results which allow us to discriminate better between the decision and mobilisation hypotheses of electoral participation. First, theoretical considerations which lead to these hypotheses are presented as well as the theory of expressive voting, and a survey of the available empiricalevidence is given. Then, we describe the empirical approach before we come to its results. Those are much in line with the mobilisation but do not support the decision hypothesis. They are, however, also only partly compatible with the theory of expressive voting.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aCenter for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo) |cMunich-
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCESifo Working Paper |x1387en_US
dc.subject.jelD72en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordexpected closenessen_US
dc.subject.keywordexpressive votingen_US
dc.subject.keywordcampaign expenditureen_US
dc.subject.keywordturnouten_US
dc.subject.keyworddirect democracyen_US
dc.subject.stwWahlverhaltenen_US
dc.subject.stwWahlbeteiligungen_US
dc.subject.stwEntscheidungen_US
dc.subject.stwReferendumen_US
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen_US
dc.subject.stwSchweizen_US
dc.titleExpected closeness or mobilisation: why do voters go to the polls? : Empirical results for Switzerland, 1981 - 1999en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn479270538en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.