Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/185569
Authors: 
Bom, Judith
Bakx, Pieter
Schut, Erik
van Doorslaer, Eddy
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2018-050/V
Abstract: 
Informal caregiving is a potentially attractive alternative to formal care but may entail health costs for the caregiver. We examine the mental and physical health impact of providing informal care and disentangle the caregiving effect – the effect of caring for someone in need – from the family effect – the effect of caring about someone in need. We account for potential endogeneity in the caregiving decision and control for previous health status using Arellano-Bond difference GMM models. We use four waves (2010-2013) of panel data from the Dutch Study on Transitions in Employment, Ability and Motivation (STREAM). We find that caregiving harms the mental health of caregivers; this effect is mainly present for spousal caregivers. A negative health shock of a family member also has a direct negative effect on mental health, providing evidence of a family effect. These findings imply that most studies may have overestimated the negative health effects of caregiving by not accounting adequately for the family effect. As the caregiving effect differs strongly between various types of caregivers, policies to counteract this effect should specifically target subgroups of caregivers that carry the largest burden of informal caregiving.
Subjects: 
long-term care
informal care
caregiver effect
family effect
mental health
JEL: 
J14
I10
J18
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
670.74 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.