Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/185185
Authors: 
Chevalier, Arnaud
Elsner, Benjamin
Lichter, Andreas
Pestel, Nico
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 11725
Abstract: 
This paper studies the impact of immigration on public policy setting. As a natural experiment, we exploit the sudden arrival of eight million forced migrants in West Germany after World War II. These migrants were on average poorer than the West German population, but unlike most international migrants they had full voting rights and were eligible for social welfare. Using panel data for West German cities and applying difference-in-differences and an instrumental variables approach, we show that local governments responded to this migration shock with selective and persistent tax raises as well as shifts in spending. In response to the inflow, farm and business owners were taxed more while residential property and wage bill taxes were left unchanged. Moreover, high-inflow cities significantly raised welfare spending while reducing spending on infrastructure and housing. Election data suggest that these policy changes were partly driven by the political influence of the immigrants: in high-inflow regions, the major parties were more likely to nominate immigrants as candidates, and a pro-immigrant party received high vote shares. We further document that this episode of mass immigration had lasting effects on people's preferences for redistribution. In areas with larger inflows in the 1940s, people have substantially higher demand for redistribution more than 50 years later.
Subjects: 
migration
taxation
spending
welfare state
JEL: 
J61
H20
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
2.48 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.