Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/184643 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2018
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
CEPIE Working Paper No. 04/18
Verlag: 
Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE), Dresden
Zusammenfassung: 
Transportation economists apply different labor supply models when studying anti-congestion policy: (i) endogenous working hours; (ii) endogenous workdays but given daily working hours; (iii) labor supply as a residual. We study whether the outcome of anti-congestion policies that change the relative cost of labor supply margins, and, thus, may affect decisions on working hours and working days, is robust against the model applied. In particular, we focus on welfare implications in the presence of other taxes when there is a congestion externality. We find surprisingly strong differences in quantity and sign. Further, we develop a clear recommendation for future research on issues that include decisions on commuting trips. Researchers shall apply both a model of endogenous working hours that provides an upper limit and a model of endogenous workdays that provide a lower limit of results for welfare changes, optimal policies and two optimal tax components (Pigouvian and Ramsey terms).
Schlagwörter: 
Public Economics
Tax Design
Time Allocation
Labor Supply
Pigouvian Tax
Urban Economics
CGE
Spatial Modeling
Transportation
Transportation Economics
Transport Policy
Congestion
JEL: 
H2
H3
J2
R1
R4
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
921.68 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.