Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/183351
Autoren: 
Hoerova, Marie
Mendicino, Caterina
Nikolov, Kalin
Schepens, Glenn
Van den Heuvel, Skander
Datum: 
2018
Reihe/Nr.: 
ECB Working Paper 2169
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper investigates the costs and benefits of liquidity regulation. We find that liquidity tools are beneficial but cannot completely remove the need for Lender of Last Resort (LOLR) interventions by the central bank. Full compliance with current Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) rules would have reduced banks' reliance on publicly provided liquidity during the global financial crisis without removing such assistance altogether. The paper also investigates the output costs of introducing the LCR and NSFR using two macro-financial models. We find these costs to be modest.
Schlagwörter: 
Banking
Liquidity regulation
Capital requirements
Central bank
Lender-of-last-resort
JEL: 
E44
E58
G21
G28
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
ISBN: 
978-92-899-3274-5
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper
Nennungen in sozialen Medien:

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
966.98 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.