Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/183206
Authors: 
Matthes, Jürgen
Voigtländer, Michael
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
IW-Report 38/2018
Abstract: 
In the political declaration of the Withdrawal Agreement the EU should leave the door open for a free trade area for goods that has been suggested by the UK's Chequers proposals. The EU would profit from such an arrangement due to its comparative advantage in goods. However, in order to achieve the EU's main objective to avoid bandwagon effects, such a trade agreement must not be depicted as a favourable deal for the UK. The narrative of the four freedoms is not indispensable to prevent bandwagon effects. A narrow interpretation can be even counterproductive, if the EU continues to regard a lesser degree of service trade integration (as suggested by the UK) as a key stumbling block for a free trade area for goods. On closer inspection, less service trade integration is not a real problem, because it would not lead to relevant competitive distortions as feared by the EU, as other areas like labour costs and social contributions are more relevant cost factors which are not (and should not) be harmonised in the EU. Moreover, the UK proposes to agree to binding rules to prevent distortions of a level playing field in terms of environmental regulations, state aid and competition policy. [...]
JEL: 
F1
F2
O52
Document Type: 
Research Report
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
631.99 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.