Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/183131
Authors: 
Croucher, Richard
Gooderham, Paul
Rizov, Marian
Year of Publication: 
2018
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Organisational Effectiveness: People and Performance [ISSN:] 2051-6614 [Volume:] 5 [Issue:] 1 [Pages:] 22-38
Abstract: 
We test Shattock’s legacy reputation thesis that non-leading universities in the UK face insuperable resource barriers to entering the leading group. Employing regression analysis, we examine whether prioritizing research performance is a viable strategy for non-leading UK universities aiming to improve their organizational effectiveness. The dependent variable, organizational effectiveness, is measured by the annual Guardian rankings of universities. The main independent variable, research performance, is measured using “research power” (‘RP’). RP is derived from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF). For 2008-14 we find that changes in research performance impacted university rankings. However, we also find that changes to the rankings are largely confined to non-leading universities and have not led to these institutions breaking into the group of leading universities. Therefore, Shattock’s thesis is supported.
Subjects: 
organizational effectiveness
research performance
UK universities
JEL: 
M11
M14
L30
Published Version’s DOI: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Manuscript Version (Preprint)

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.