Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/182071 
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
GLO Discussion Paper No. 247
Publisher: 
Global Labor Organization (GLO), Maastricht
Abstract: 
The initial earnings of U.S. immigrants vary enormously by country of origin. Via three interrelated analyses, we show earnings convergence across source countries with time in the United States. Human-capital theory plausibly explains the inverse relationship between initial earnings and earnings growth rates: the good fit between data and theory suggests that variation in initial skill transferability—not variation in the “quality” of human capital—underlies variation in initial earnings. A new method of testing for emigration bias confirms that selective emigration does not cause the convergence. Functional form and sample selections embedded in most recent analyses of immigrant economic assimilation bias downwards the earnings growth of post-1965 U.S. immigrants. When both functional-form and sample-selection constraints are lifted, a dramatically different picture of the economic assimilation of U.S. immigrants emerges.
Subjects: 
immigrant economic assimilation
human capital investment
country of origin
immigrant earnings convergence
earnings growth
unbiased estimation
JEL: 
J1
J2
J3
C1
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.