Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/180925
Authors: 
Enria, Luisa
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing No. 53
Abstract: 
This article explores the implications of framing an event as a 'crisis' through the case study of the Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone, based on extensive ethnographic fieldwork during and after the outbreak. It traces how Ebola came to be declared an emergency, and the processes, which led to its definition as a 'threat to international peace and security'. Secondly, it highlights the consequences of this framing, as particular interpretations of the roots of the emergency drew a line between 'good' citizens willing to adapt and 'dangerous' ones needing to be contained. Finally, it turns to an ethnographic portrait of a traditional healer's attempts to navigate the crisis by appropriating the knowledge produced by the response apparatus. Considering how those at the receiving end of policy discourses strategically reposition themselves in relation to the narratives that frame them, can help us question the reductive dichotomy between adaptation to and resistance against interventions.
Subjects: 
Ebola
Sierra Leone
emergency
knowledge production
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.