Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/180883
Authors: 
Stinebrickner, Todd R.
Stinebrickner, Ralph
Sullivan, Paul
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
CHCP Working Paper 2017-5
Abstract: 
We use novel data to show that the beauty wage premium exists only in jobs where attractiveness is plausibly a productive characteristic. A large premium exists in jobs that require substantial amounts of interpersonal interaction, but no such premium exists in jobs that require working with information and data. This is inconsistent with employer taste-based discrimination, which would favor attractive workers in all jobs. Our unique task data address concerns that measurement error in the importance of interpersonal tasks may bias results towards employer discrimination. Our conclusions are in stark contrast to all previous research that uses a similar approach.
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
884.27 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.