Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/178835
Year of Publication: 
2017
Citation: 
[Journal:] The International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology (IJMSIT) [ISSN:] 1923-0273 [Issue:] 23 [Publisher:] NAISIT Publishers [Place:] Toronto [Year:] 2017 [Pages:] 12-26
Publisher: 
NAISIT Publishers, Toronto
Abstract: 
The objective of this study were to Establish the influence of training and Time Allocated on performance of monitoring and evaluation of Government Projects case of CDF projects in Kajiado East Sub-County and Determine how Funds available for monitoring and evaluation influence performance of monitoring and evaluation of Government Projects case of CDF projects in Kajiado East Sub- County. The study employed a descriptive survey research design. The target population was 138 respondents from which same sample of 122 was obtain from. The researcher used selected122 respondents. Numerical data collected using questionnaires was coded and entered and analyzed with help of a computer Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) version 21 software programme. The data was analysed using Correlation and regression where the study used karl-pearson correlation to relate the variables. The findings of the study were, in relation to the first objective found that that the level of training on M & E was of central importance to the performance public projects, second objective found that There was a high correlation between Influence of Training and Performance of Monitoring and Evaluation, Influence of Time and Performance of Monitoring and Evaluation and Influence of Strength of Monitoring Team. M & E is important for success of any project, yet it is in most Government projects they have not been able to adopt it effectively. The role of Training, Time Management and Strength of Monitoring Team only 22.6 percent unexplained. The P- value of 0.004 (Less than 0.05) implies that the model of factors influencing performance of M & E is significant at the 95% confidence level. A continuous improvement process typically contains three activities that operate in an interactive manner in project management: Time cost and Quality
Subjects: 
Time
Training
Monitoring and Evaluation
performance
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.