Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 17-106/IV
Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam
Using a unique transactions dataset from the Amsterdam office market, this paper examines the determinants of property lease incentives. The study focuses on the type of landlord involved (institutional/private) and whether the tenant or landlord used an advisor (professional broker) to help negotiate the lease. The results show that an institutional landlord, ceteris paribus, offers 3 percentage points more incentives than a private owner. In addition, a landlord who uses the services of an advisor pays 9 percentage points less incentives. An advisor at the side of the tenant increases incentives by 7 percentage points. However, if both parties use an advisor there are no additional benefits in terms of lease incentives. These findings are in line with a prisoner's dilemma story. Further results show an effect of the lease term and economic cycle on lease incentives. The results in this paper highlight the crucial role of market information, information asymmetry, and bargaining in the market for commercial real estate.
commercial real estate
office market
lease incentives
information asymmetry
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
855.4 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.