Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/175742
Authors: 
Baldo, Luca
Hallinger, Benoît
Helmus, Caspar
Herrala, Niko
Martins, Débora
Mohing, Felix
Petroulakis, Filippos
Resinek, Marc
Vergote, Olivier
Usciati, Benoît
Wang, Yizhou
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
ECB Occasional Paper 200
Abstract: 
Since 2008, excess liquidity - defined as the sum of holdings of central bank reserves in excess of reserve requirements and holdings of equivalent central bank deposits - has tended to accumulate in specific euro area countries and in a small, slowly changing group of credit institutions. Despite the stability of the concentration of excess liquidity in specific countries over time, the relevance of individual drivers has changed. First, risk aversion has played a much smaller role in explaining the concentration since 2013 than it did at the time of "flight-to-quality" phenomena in the period 2010-12. Second, the location of the relevant market infrastructures (i.e. central securities depositories, securities settlement systems and TARGET2 accounts) used by counterparties that sold assets to the Eurosystem has been a more important driver directing flows in the period 2015-16. In addition, the more recent concentration of excess liquidity is explained by the combination of a number of factors, such as banks following strict internal credit limits, investment incentives created by yield differences across the euro area and the "home bias" in euro area government bond holdings. Overall, the net cross-border flows of liquidity that resulted also determined TARGET2 balances. At the individual bank level, when controlling for banks' capital, non-performing loans, credit risk and profitability, excess liquidity holdings in relation to total assets are found to be higher for smaller and better-capitalised banks, and for banking groups with liquidity centralised at the head institution. In addition, participation in Eurosystem longer-term refinancing operations and deposit inflows are associated with liquidity accumulation. Finally, new regulatory initiatives such as the liquidity coverage ratio are explained to be creating incentives to hold or not to distribute liquidity, thereby affecting its distribution.
Subjects: 
excess liquidity
financial structure
asset purchase programme
bank characteristics
regulatory changes
JEL: 
D39
E41
E44
E50
G01
G28
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-92-899-2862-5
Document Type: 
Research Report

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.