Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/175195
Authors: 
Hanrieder, Tine
Year of Publication: 
2017
Citation: 
[Journal:] Contemporary Politics [ISSN:] 1469-3631 [Publisher:] Taylor & Francis [Place:] Abingdon [Volume:] 23 [Year:] 2017 [Issue:] 1 [Pages:] 81-99
Abstract: 
This article explores how the role of religion is evaluated in global health institutions, focusing on policy debates in the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank. Drawing on Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot’s pragmatist approach to justification, I suggest that religious values are creative and worldly performances. The public value of religion is established through a two-pronged justification process, combining generalizing arguments with particularizing empirical tests. To substantiate the claim that abstraction alone does not suffice to create religious values in global public health, I compare the futile attempts of the 1980s to add ‘spiritual health’ to the WHO’s mandate with the more recent creation of a ‘faith factor’ in public health. While the vague reference to some ‘Factor X’ inhibited the acceptance of spiritual health in the first case, in the second case, ‘compassion’ became a measurable and recognized religious value.
Subjects: 
global health governance
religion
secularism
spiritual health
public justification
valuation theory
Published Version’s DOI: 
Additional Information: 
Akzeptierte Manuskriptfassung (postprint) / Accepted version (postprint)
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)
Social Media Mentions:

12



Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.