Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/172622
Authors: 
Klodt, Henning
Lang, Stefanie
Year of Publication: 
2015
Citation: 
[Journal:] Wirtschaftsdienst [ISSN:] 1613-978X [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Volume:] 95 [Year:] 2015 [Issue:] 8 [Pages:] 570-571
Abstract: 
Im Juliheft 2015 veröffentlichte der Wirtschaftsdienst einen Aufsatz von Henning Klodt und Stefanie Lang zum Treaty Shopping. Sebastian Dullien weist auf eine seiner Auffassung nach fehlerhafte Darstellung des bilateralen Investitionsschutzabkommens zwischen Deutschland und Pakistan aus dem Jahre 1959 hin und die Autoren erläutern ihren Standpunkt in einer Erwiderung.
Abstract (Translated): 
Reply: The article by Klodt and Lang uses the Germany-Pakistan bilateral investment treaty from 1959 as an example of a treaty with investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions. Dullien insists that this treaty only contains a state-state-dispute settlement provision. Response: Klodt and Lang repeat that the above-mentioned treaty is the first to treat investment matters, but they concede that it is more of a state-state-dispute settlement process. They cast doubts on the preferability of such settlements.
JEL: 
F53
F55
K33
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size
123.33 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.