Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/171388
Authors: 
Kapeller, Jakob
Pühringer, Stephan
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
ICAE Working Paper Series 10
Abstract: 
This paper shows how classical liberalism differs from neoliberalism with respect to the frames, concepts and ideas used to describe and clarify the concept of democracy. In short we argue that while classical liberalism provides central principles for the design of western democratic institutions, a neoliberal understanding of democracy tends to undermine these very same principles. To illustrate this claim we look at the differences between two main proponents of the revival of liberalism in the second part of the 20th century, namely F.A. Hayek and K.R. Popper, with respect to their vision of acceptable democratic conduct. The differences between these two thinkers illustrate the loss of liberalism's rather clear concept of democracy through its transformation to neoliberalism.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
321.43 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.