Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/171180 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2017
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] IZA World of Labor [ISSN:] 2054-9571 [Article No.:] 372 [Publisher:] Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) [Place:] Bonn [Year:] 2017
Verlag: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Why do different population groups (e.g. rural vs. urban, youth vs. elderly and men vs. women) experience the same objective labor status differently? One hypothesis is that people are more concerned with relative deprivation than objective deprivation and they value their own status relative to the status of their peers—the reference group. One way to test this hypothesis in the labor market is to measure individual differences in labor status while controlling for characteristics that define population groups. This measure is called “relative labor deprivation” and can help policymakers to better understand how labor claims are generated.
Schlagwörter: 
objective deprivation
subjective deprivation
unemployment
social discontent
JEL: 
H3
I3
J2
J4
J7
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
431.98 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.