Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/169177
Authors: 
Alabanos, Nikos
Theodoropoulos, Sotiris
Year of Publication: 
2016
Citation: 
[Journal:] SPOUDAI - Journal of Economics and Business [ISSN:] 2241-424X [Volume:] 66 [Year:] 2016 [Issue:] 1/2 [Pages:] 32-45
Abstract: 
As administrative burden's reduction (AB) is of crucial importance in order to ensure competitive conditions for national economies, measurement standardization and objectivity is a key component for the implementation of good regulation principles and administrative cost reduction. International experience designates both the main challenges and the limitations in which existent models are subjected to. Moreover, a thorough comparison among the existent administrative burden models' (ABM's) stresses specific gaps mainly on data and sampling measurement methods, while the widespread need for a common comparison benchmark among different countries should be addressed.
Subjects: 
Administrative burden
administrative costs
substantive costs
regulatory compliance
international comparison
JEL: 
G38
K20
L51
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
171.81 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.