Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/167881 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2016
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Risks [ISSN:] 2227-9091 [Volume:] 4 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] MDPI [Place:] Basel [Year:] 2016 [Pages:] 1-18
Verlag: 
MDPI, Basel
Zusammenfassung: 
Traditional participating life insurance contracts with year-to-year (cliquet-style) guarantees have come under pressure in the current situation of low interest rates and volatile capital markets, in particular when priced in a market-consistent valuation framework. In addition, such guarantees lead to rather high capital requirements under risk-based solvency frameworks such as Solvency II or the Swiss Solvency Test (SST). Therefore, insurers in several countries have developed new forms of participating products with alternative (typically weaker and/or lower) guarantees that are less risky for the insurer. In a previous paper, it has been shown that such alternative product designs can lead to higher capital efficiency, i.e., higher and more stable profits and reduced capital requirements. As a result, the financial risk for the insurer is significantly reduced while the main guarantee features perceived and requested by the policyholder are preserved. Based on these findings, this paper now combines the insurer's and the policyholder's perspective by analyzing product versions that compensate policyholders for the less valuable guarantees. We particularly identify combinations of asset allocation and profit participation rate for the different product designs that lead to an identical expected profit for the insurer (and identical risk-neutral value for the policyholder), but differ with respect to the insurer's risk and solvency capital requirements as well as with respect to the real-world return distribution for the policyholder. We show that alternative products can be designed in a way that the insurer's expected profitability remains unchanged, the insurer's risk and hence capital requirement is substantially reduced and the policyholder's expected return is increased. This illustrates that such products might be able to reconcile insurers' and policyholders' interests and serve as an alternative to the rather risky cliquet-style products.
Schlagwörter: 
participating life insurance
interest rate guarantees
capital efficiency
asset allocation
profit participation rate
policyholder's expected return
solvency capital requirements
Solvency II
SST
market-consistent valuation
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Erscheint in der Sammlung:

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
2.65 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.