Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/163007
Authors: 
Capraro, Valerio
Corgnet, Brice
Espín, Antonio M.
Hernán-González, Roberto
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
CeDEx Discussion Paper Series 2016-06
Abstract: 
Groups make decisions on both the production and the distribution of resources. These decisions typically involve a tension between increasing the total level of group resources (i.e. social efficiency) and distributing these resources among group members (i.e. individuals' relative shares). This is the case because the redistribution process may destroy part of the resources, thus resulting in socially inefficient allocations. Here we apply a dualprocess approach to understand the cognitive underpinnings of this fundamental tension. We conducted a set of experiments to examine the extent to which different allocation decisions respond to intuition or deliberation. In a newly developed approach, we assess intuition and deliberation at both the trait level (using the Cognitive Reflection Test, henceforth CRT) and the state level (through the experimental manipulation of response times). To test for robustness, experiments were conducted in two countries: the US and India. Despite aggregate differences across countries, in both locations and at both levels of analysis, we show that: (i) time pressure and low CRT scores are associated with individuals' concerns for their relative shares; (ii) time delay and high CRT scores are associated with individuals' concerns for social efficiency. These findings demonstrate that deliberation favors social efficiency by overriding individuals' intuitive tendency to focus on relative shares.
Subjects: 
efficiency
equality
dual process models
intuition
deliberation
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.