Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/162975 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2017
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper Series No. 632
Verlag: 
University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics, Heidelberg
Zusammenfassung: 
Motivated by the Basel 3 regulations, recent studies have considered joint forecasts of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. A large family of scoring functions can be used to evaluate forecast performance in this context. However, little intuitive or empirical guidance is currently available, which renders the choice of scoring function awkward in practice. We therefore develop graphical checks (Murphy diagrams) of whether one forecast method dominates another under a relevant class of scoring functions, and propose an associated hypothesis test. We illustrate these tools with simulation examples and an empirical analysis of S&P 500 and DAX returns.
Schlagwörter: 
Forecasting
Expected Shortfall
JEL: 
C52
C53
G17
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
801.66 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.