Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/162524
Authors: 
Adena, Maja
Huck, Steffen
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper 16
Abstract: 
Is there a way of matching donations that avoids crowding out? We introduce a novel matching method where the matched amount is allocated to a different project, present some simple theoretical considerations that predict reduced crowding out or crowding in (depending on the degree of substitutability between the two projects) and present evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment and a laboratory experiment. Similar to findings in the literature, conventional matching for the same project results in partial crowding out in the field experiment and, as predicted, crowding out is reduced under the novel matching scheme. The lab experiment provides more fine-tuned evidence for the change in crowding and yields further support for the theory: the novel matching method works best when the two projects are complements rather than substitutes.
Subjects: 
charitable giving
matched fundraising
natural field experiment
JEL: 
C93
D64
D12
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
422.76 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.