Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/161332
Authors: 
Siniver, Erez
Tobol, Yossi
Yaniv, Gideon
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 10709
Abstract: 
The extensive body of survey-based research correlating between students' cheating and their academic grade point average (GPA) consistently finds a significant negative relationship between cheating and the GPA. The present paper reports the results of a two-round experiment designed to expose student cheating at the individual level and correlate it with three intellectual achievement measures: the GPA, the high-school matriculation average grade (MAG) and the psychometric exam score (PES). The experiment involved two classes of third-year economics students incentivized by a competitive reward to answer a multiple-choice trivia quiz without consulting their electronic devices. While this forbiddance was deliberately overlooked in the first round, providing an opportunity to cheat, it was strictly enforced in the second, conducted two months later in the same classes with the same quiz. A comparison of subjects' performance in the two rounds, self-revealed a considerable extent of cheating in the first one. Regressing the individual cheating levels on subjects' gender and their intellectual achievement measures exhibited no significant differences in cheating between males and females. However, cheating of both genders was found to significantly increase with each achievement measure, implying, in sharp contrast with the direct-question surveys, that higher achievers are bigger cheaters.
Subjects: 
experimental data
cheating behavior
intellectual achievement
JEL: 
A22
C91
C92
K42
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
861.11 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.