Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/161293 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2017
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 10670
Verlag: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
This study uses panel data for Australia from the HILDA Survey to estimate the wage differential between workers in temporary jobs and workers in permanent jobs. Specifically, unconditional quantile regression methods with fixed effects are used to examine how this gap varies over the entire wages distribution. While fixed-term contract workers are on rates of pay that are similar to permanent workers, low-paid casual workers experience a wage penalty and high-paid casual workers a wage premium compared to their permanent counterparts. Finally, temporary agency workers usually receive a wage premium, which is particularly large for the most well paid.
Schlagwörter: 
temporary employment wages
HILDA Survey
quantile regression
longitudinal data
JEL: 
J31
J41
C21
C23
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.33 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.