Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/161148
Authors: 
Gaitz, Jason
Schurer, Stefanie
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 10525
Abstract: 
This paper evaluates the impact of the Australian Baby Bonus a $3000 one-off cash transfer on various aspects of child human capital development. Using high-quality longitudinal cohort data and difference-in-difference models, we compare the outcomes of cohort members whose younger sibling was born marginally on either side of July 1, 2004, when the Baby Bonus was introduced. Our results suggest that the Baby Bonus was not effective in boosting learning, socio-emotional or physical health outcomes of the average pre-school child. This finding is strengthened by the observation that the Baby Bonus did not impact parental well-being, parental behavior and labor supply, the potential mechanisms via which the cash transfer could have affected human capital formation. The muted effect for the Baby Bonus in comparison to significant effects for similar cash handouts in other countries may be explained by its non-targeted and one-off structure. We conclude that the large financial cost of $3000 per child is not justified as an intervention for the entire population to boost children's skills.
Subjects: 
cash transfers
Baby Bonus
cognitive and non-cognitive skills
health
LSAC
JEL: 
J24
H53
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
258.5 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.