Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/159924
Authors: 
Chesterley, Nicholas
Roberti, Paolo
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
Quaderni - Working Paper DSE 1086
Abstract: 
This paper considers electoral behavior and institutional capture when voters choose between a populist and non-populist politician. Populist politicians provide voters with a utility boom followed by a subsequent bust, as in Dornbusch and Edwards (The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, University of Chicago Press, 1991). Non-populists provide a constant level of utility. Once in power, however, politicians of both types are able to seize control of institutions to ensure their re-election. We show that in equilibrium, populist politicians may capture institutions to avoid being replaced during the bust: non-populists do not. Voters rationally elect a populist if voters discount the future sufficiently or if it is too costly for the populist to seize control of institutions. Unfortunately, both types of politician may prefer weakened institutions, either to allow their capture or to discourage the election of the populist.
JEL: 
D72
D73
D74
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
540.22 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.