Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/159282
Authors: 
Barigozzi, Francesca
Garella, Paolo
Peitz, Martin
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
Quaderni - Working Paper DSE 441
Abstract: 
Comparative advertising content di¤ers from generic. We discover that dissipative advertising has consequences depending upon content and cost. Comparison advertising may trigger legal action by rival …rms that are named. In the model an entrant signals its product quality. By a comparative ad the entrant refers to the incumbent's product. We show that comparison can enhance the signaling potential of dissipative advertising. From the viewpoint of the entrant, the choice of comparative advertising empowers the rival with the right to sue; generic does not. Consumers therefore infer that if the entrant uses comparative instead of generic ads it has a strong case.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
368.01 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.