Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/158644 
Year of Publication: 
2006
Citation: 
[Journal:] Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research [ISSN:] 2510-5027 [Volume:] 39 [Issue:] 3/4 [Publisher:] Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) [Place:] Nürnberg [Year:] 2006 [Pages:] 477-490
Publisher: 
Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg
Abstract (Translated): 
The so-called Hartz reform introduced fundamental changes for publicly sponsored training in Germany. This concerns primarily the issuing of training vouchers as an exclusive allocation device, allowing potential participants free choice between training providers within a given training target range. In addition, the issue of training vouchers is made conditional on a job-seeker having sufficient re-employment prospects. We make a comparative examination of the impact of participation for the most important type of training program in quantitative terms before and after the reform by using administrative data from the Federal Employment Agency. Based on conditional propensity score matching, we investigate average treatment effects by means of non-parametrically estimated state probabilities and semi-parametrically estimated transition rates. Our results show that participation in training programs already had a positive impact on employment prospects before the reform. Results for the relatively short observation period since the reform point to a further increase in effectiveness. The driving force behind this seems to come from reducing the duration of training programs, which has decreased the lock-in effect without affecting the program effect.
Subjects: 
Weiterbildungsförderung - Erfolgskontrolle
Hartz-Reform
Bildungsgutschein
arbeitsmarktpolitische Maßnahme
Integrierte Erwerbsbiografien
Beschäftigungseffekte
Arbeitslosigkeitsbekämpfung
berufliche Reintegration
Lock-in-Effekte
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.