Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/158602 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Citation: 
[Journal:] Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research [ISSN:] 2510-5027 [Volume:] 38 [Issue:] 2/3 [Publisher:] Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) [Place:] Nürnberg [Year:] 2005 [Pages:] 218-229
Publisher: 
Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg
Abstract (Translated): 
Judicial decisions concerning industrial action have strengthened the right to strike and made lockouts virtually impossible. Employers respond to such a shift in the power on the labour market with relocations and power on the goods market. In addition the trade unions are threatened by self-interested functional elites. All this calls into question the suitability of industrial action for resolving conflicts. If the conflict-resolving function of industrial action is to be retained, restrictions in the right to strike are necessary. In order to avoid detrimental industrial action it is necessary to attempt effective mediation. It is imperative that advance notice be given of industrial action. The employees must also be held responsible for effects of detrimental industrial action on third-party enterprises, as a risk of the industrial action. Every strike requires an authorising strike ballot in the trade union. An effective emergency service order must be established for firms providing services for the public. The works council must not be able to use participation rights and information rights in order to influence the dispute.
Subjects: 
Arbeitskampf - Recht
Streikrecht - Änderung
Aussperrung
Tarifpolitik
Tarifrecht
Tarifverhandlungen - Recht
Konfliktmanagement
Macht
Schlichtung
Arbeitgeberverband
Gewerkschaft
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.