Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/157800 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2016
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Capital & Class [Volume:] 40 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] The Bichler and Nitzan Archives [Place:] Toronto [Year:] 2016 [Pages:] 533-554
Verlag: 
The Bichler and Nitzan Archives, Toronto
Zusammenfassung: 
The article reviews debates concerning financialization in South Korea, with a focus on ongoing arguments between liberal, post-Keynesian, institutionalist and Marxist economists. It argues that post-Keynesian and institutionalist perspectives in particular neglect important class processes through which the financial circuit operates within the Korean economy, especially the power of Korea’s large, family-led conglomerates, or chaebol. In order to build upon Marxist approaches to Korean finance, we argue that Nitzen and Bichler’s approach to the ‘capitalization’ of capitalist class power provides a useful heuristic for understanding the differential power of Korean chaebol and their integration into global capital.
Schlagwörter: 
capital as power
chaebol
developmental state
financialization
institutional political economy
Marxian economics
post-Keynesian economics
South Korea
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: 
DOI der veröffentlichten Version: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)

Datei(en):





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.