Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/157301
Authors: 
Holzmann, Robert
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Policy Paper 111
Abstract: 
This policy paper summarizes four corridor studies on bilateral social security agreements (BSSAs) between four EU Member and two non-Member States, draws conclusions on their results, and offers recommendations. BSSAs between migrant-sending and migrant-receiving countries are seen as the most important instrument to establish portability of social security benefits for internationally mobile workers. Yet only about 23 percent of international migrants profit from BSSAs and their functioning has been little analyzed and even less assessed. The four corridors studied (Austria-Turkey, Germany-Turkey, Belgium-Morocco, and France-Morocco) were selected to allow for comparison of both similarities and differences in experiences. The evaluation of these corridors' BSSAs was undertaken against a methodological framework and three selected criteria: fairness for individuals, fiscal fairness for countries, and bureaucratic effectiveness for countries and migrant workers. The results suggest that the investigated BSSAs work and overall deliver reasonably well on individual fairness. The results on fiscal fairness are clouded by conceptual and empirical gaps. Bureaucratic effectiveness would profit from ICT-based exchanges on both corridors once available.
Subjects: 
acquired rights
labor mobility
migration corridor
administration
evaluation
JEL: 
D69
H55
I19
J62
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
479.75 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.