Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/155767
Authors: 
Szekeres, Szabolcs
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
Economics Discussion Papers 2017-11
Abstract: 
In "How should the distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain?" (2010) Gollier and Weitzman claimed having solved the Weitzman-Gollier puzzle, concluding from a risk-averse utility maximizing model that Weitzman discounting is qualitatively correct and that when uncertain annual interest rates are highly correlated, long term discount rates are declining functions of time. This paper quantifies a similar model and comes to the opposite conclusion. Weitzman discounting is wrong; there is no puzzle if the correct method is used. Risk-neutral discount rates are growing, rather than declining functions of time under the Weitzman assumptions. Risk-averse discount rates can be declining, but must not be used to discount risky project's cash flows; risk adjusted rates must be used instead. When long term market yields are a growing function of time, it makes no sense to invest in projects of similar risk but lesser yield, irrespective of one's degree of risk-aversion.
Subjects: 
Weitzman-Gollier puzzle
declining discount rates
discounting
JEL: 
D61
H43
Creative Commons License: 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
955.49 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.