Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/155750
Authors: 
Gawel, Erik
Year of Publication: 
2015
Citation: 
[Journal:] Intereconomics [ISSN:] 1613-964X [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Volume:] 50 [Year:] 2015 [Issue:] 1 [Pages:] 40-45
Abstract: 
The EU Water Framework Directive stipulates the principle of cost recovery, including environmental and resource costs, for European water services. Yet a definition of member states' precise obligations is highly controversial. This particularly holds true for the question whether the request for cost recovery can be restricted to water supply and wastewater disposal only, as many member states argue. The European Court of Justice has now decided on the Commission's infringement proceedings against Germany regarding the scope of the term 'water services'. In its eagerly awaited substantive decision, the Court dismissed the Commission's action as unfounded but left the door open for further claims. However, many legal arguments in favour of a strict interpretation of cost recovery are not only misleading but also pass up valuable opportunities to deal with scarce water resources in an efficient way.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
150.35 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.