Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Daily, Gretchen
Dasgupta, Partha
Bolin, Bert
Crosson, Pierre
du Guerny, Jacques
Ehrlich, Paul
Folke, Carl
Jansson, Ann Marie
Jansson, Bengt-Owe
Kautsky, Nils
Kinzig, Ann
Levin, Simon
Mäler, Karl-Göran
Pinstrup-Andersen, Per
Siniscalco, Domenico
Walker Brian
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Nota di Lavoro No. 21.1998
There are two broad criteria by which one can judge humanity's success in feeding itself: (i) the proportion of people whose access to basic nutritional requirements is secure; and (ii) the extent to which global food production is sustainable. Even though the two are related, they have usually been discussed separately in popular writings. This has had unfortunate consequences. Writings on (ii) have often encouraged readers to adopt an all-or-nothing position (viz. the future will be either rosy or catastrophic), and this has drawn attention away from the economic misery that is endemic in large parts of the world today. On the other hand, writings on (i) have frequently yielded no more than the catechism that the nearly 1 billion people in poor countries who go to bed hungry each night do so because they are extremely poor. In short, if (ii) has focused on aggregate food production and its prospects for the future, (i) in contrast has isolated food-distribution failure as a cause of world hunger. In this article we will adopt the view that (i) and (ii) should not be studied separately, that their link can be understood if attention is paid to the dynamic interactions between ecological and economic systems operating primarily at the geographically localised level.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.