Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/154795
Authors: 
VanDenBergh, Roger J.
Year of Publication: 
1997
Series/Report no.: 
Nota di Lavoro, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei 31.1997
Abstract: 
In the Gebhard judgement the European Court of Justice has formulated the requirements which must be satisfied for self-regulatory restrictions on entry (such as the protection of titles and compulsory membership of public professional bodies) to be compatible with the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the EC-Treaty. The paper suggests how the legal criteria may be clarified by economic insights to enable a better assessment of their conformity with the EC Treaty. To demonstrate that regulation is needed for imperative reasons of public interest, it should be shown that the self-regulatory measures are able to cope with market failures (information asymmetries, externalities). To show that the measures go not beyond what is necessary to attain this goal (requirement of proportionality), it should be shown that there are no alternative rules which cope with the relevant market failures as effectively as the current rules, without causing the same inefficiencies.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.