Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/153208
Authors: 
Christiano, Lawrence
Motto, Roberto
Rostagno, Massimo
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
ECB Working Paper 774
Abstract: 
The US Federal Reserve cut interest rates more vigorously in the recent recession than the European Central Bank did. By comparison with the Fed, the ECB followed a more measured course of action. We use an estimated dynamic general equilibrium model with financial frictions to show that comparisons based on such simple metrics as the variance of policy rates are misleading. We find that - because there is greater inertia in the ECB’s policy rule - the ECB’s policy actions actually had a greater stabilizing effect than did those of the Fed. As a consequence, a potentially severe recession turned out to be only a slowdown, and inflation never departed from levels consistent with the ECB’s quantitative definition of price stability. Other factors that account for the different economic outcomes in the Euro Area and US include differences in shocks and differences in the degree of wage and price flexibility.
Subjects: 
DSGE model
Policy activism
policy inertia
shocks
JEL: 
C51
E52
E58
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.