Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/150489
Authors: 
Mühlbacher, Axel C.
Zweifel, Peter
Kaczynski, Anika
Johnson, F. Reed
Year of Publication: 
2016
Citation: 
[Journal:] Health Economics Review [ISSN:] 2191-1991 [Volume:] 6 [Year:] 2016 [Issue:] 5 [Pages:] 1-12
Abstract: 
For optimal solutions in health care, decision makers inevitably must evaluate trade-offs, which call for multiattribute valuation methods. Researchers have proposed using best-worst scaling (BWS) methods which seek to extract information from respondents by asking them to identify the best and worst items in each choice set. While a companion paper describes the different types of BWS, application and their advantages and downsides, this contribution expounds their relationships with microeconomic theory, which also have implications for statistical inference. This article devotes to the microeconomic foundations of preference measurement, also addressing issues such as scale invariance and scale heterogeneity. Furthermore the paper discusses the basics of preference measurement using rating, ranking and stated choice data in the light of the findings of the preceding section. Moreover the paper gives an introduction to the use of stated choice data and juxtaposes BWS with the microeconomic foundations.
Subjects: 
Choice Experiments
Stated Preferences
Discrete Choice Experiments
Best-Worst Scaling
MaxDiff
Scaling
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
970.07 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.