Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149747
Authors: 
Evers, Maria Theresia
Meier, Ina
Nicolay, Katharina
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
ZEW Discussion Papers 17-003
Abstract: 
Over the last decade, a large body of tax accounting literature on the association between book-tax conformity (BTC)/book-tax differences (BTD) and firms' opportunistic reporting behavior has emerged. Yet, existing empirical evidence on the questions whether increased book-tax conformity actually reduces Earnings Management (EM) and/or Tax Sheltering (TS) and whether book-tax differences are really indicative of such opportunistic reporting behavior is not yet clear. We therefore conduct a meta-analysis aimed at identifying the sources of heterogeneity in primary studies and at providing a consensus estimate with respect to the sign and the statistical significance level for the examined association. Our qualitative literature review reveals that major sources of heterogeneity in the study design include differences in the proxies for EM and TS and in the measures used to determine BTD and BTC. Our meta-regression results show that BTD are indeed indicative of opportunistic reporting behavior, and even more so of EM. These results are, however, weaker for studies that determine BTD only roughly as the difference between book and estimated taxable income instead of using more specific BTD proxies. Moreover, examining actual BTD computed from tax returns instead of only approximating these from financial statements strongly increases the effects. Hence, efforts taken to accurately determine BTD seem to be worth wile when it comes to the explanatory power for opportunistic reporting. Furthermore, our results suggest a negative association between book-tax conformity and EM/TS, which we interpret as an indicator for higher conformity indeed being effective in reducing aggressive reporting.
Subjects: 
book-tax conformity
book-tax differences
tax sheltering
earnings management
meta-analysis
JEL: 
H20
H26
K34
M41
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
444.17 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.