Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149556
Autoren: 
Herzfeld, Thomas
Jongeneel, Roel
Datum: 
2012
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Land Use Policy [ISSN:] 0264-8377 [Volume:] 29 [Year:] 2012 [Issue:] 1 [Pages:] 250-260
Zusammenfassung: 
Agricultural production experiences a shift in underlying institutions during the last years., Importance of private stakeholders like retailers, processors, consumers as well as tax payers is, emerging. Eligibility for single farm payments and marketing of products is linked to compliance with, diverse codes of practice and standards. Voluntary certification schemes are not only relevant with, respect to agriculture's traditional activity (i.e. food production), but is also highly relevant in case of, rural policies. Examples are the EU's agri-environmental schemes, aimed at preserving biodiversity, landscape elements, etc., which are characterized by voluntary participation and the contractual, commitment to apply certain standards. However, these relationships are highly characterized by, information asymmetries. Economic literature offers several approaches to analyse similar relations. The classical approach bases on the assumption of utility maximising agents that will comply with, rules as long as the net utility of compliance will be higher than the net utility of an offence. Recent, evidence challenges this result. Experiments show that people behave more honest than the classical, deterrence model predicts. Main objective of the paper is to compare the various approaches to explain, compliant behaviour. Additionally, an outlook for empirical applications of the theoretical framework, developed here is given to motivate further research. However, our outlook shows that the selection of, appropriate variables to analyse compliance empirically is open to debate.
Schlagwörter: 
Regulation
Cross-compliance
Quality standards
Compliant behaviour
DOI der veröffentlichten Version: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.