Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Chang, Chia-Lin
McAleer, Michael
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 16-094/III
An early development in testing for causality (technically, Granger non-causality) in the conditional variance (or volatility) associated with financial returns, was the portmanteau statistic for non-causality in variance of Cheng and Ng (1996). A subsequent development was the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test of non-causality in the conditional variance by Hafner and Herwartz (2006), who provided simulations results to show that their LM test was more powerful than the portmanteau statistic. While the LM test for causality proposed by Hafner and Herwartz (2006) is an interesting and useful development, it is nonetheless arbitrary. In particular, the specification on which the LM test is based does not rely on an underlying stochastic process, so that the alternative hypothesis is also arbitrary, which can affect the power of the test. The purpose of the paper is to derive a simple test for causality in volatility that provides regularity conditions arising from the underlying stochastic process, namely a random coefficient autoregressive process, and for which the (quasi-) maximum likelihood estimates have valid asymptotic properties. The simple test is intuitively appealing as it is based on an underlying stochastic process, is sympathetic to Granger’s (1969, 1988) notion of time series predictability, is easy to implement, and has a regularity condition that is not available in the LM test.
Random coefficient stochastic process
Simple test
Granger non-causality
Regularity conditions
Asymptotic properties
Conditional volatility
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
105.61 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.