Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149249
Authors: 
Imas, Alex
Kuhn, Michael A.
Mironova, Vera
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper 6162
Abstract: 
We study the role of heuristic versus deliberative processing in intertemporal choice. Using studies in the Democratic Republic of Congo and an online labor market, we show that waiting periods –designed to prompt deliberation by temporally separating news about choice sets from choices themselves– can shift individuals away from decisions consistent with heuristic thinking and lead to substantially more patient choices. These findings are not captured by exponential or hyperbolic discounting. Additionally, waiting periods have larger effects on those shown to be particularly prone to myopia as a result of prior trauma, highlighting their potential as targeted interventions.
Subjects: 
time preferences
waiting periods
heuristics
deliberation
field experiments
JEL: 
D03
D90
C91
C93
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.