Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149236
Authors: 
von Fintel, Dieter
Pienaar, Louw
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 10377
Abstract: 
Cash transfers successfully alleviate poverty in many developing countries. South Africa is a case in point, implementing one of the largest unconditional cash transfer programmes internationally, and with substantial benefits to household well-being along multiple dimensions. Yet, grants discourage formal labour market attachment, creating dependencies on the fiscus. This study uses a fuzzy regression discontinuity design to establish that state-funded Old Age Pensions encourage non-market economic activity (in the form of small-scale farming), and improve the self-reported food security of rural households that farm, vis-à-vis those that do not. However, only non-farming households increase market food expenditure and consume more diverse diets from market-sourced foods: diet quality improves with greater spending, while food sufficiency remains unaffected. Farmers, on the other hand, do not change food spending patterns, but self-rated food sufficiency improves due to greater levels and diversity in home production. The role of small-scale farming is of broader interest in rural development, given the context of the 1913 and 1936 Land Acts that constrained this form of livelihood in former apartheid homelands. This paper's contribution is two-fold: grants are an effective channel to actively promote rural development through small-scale farming, and they improve food security by non-market mechanisms.
Subjects: 
cash transfers
small-scale farming
food security
South Africa
Apartheid homelands
regression discontinuity design
JEL: 
Q12
Q18
Q15
D13
C26
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
797.31 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.