Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/148395 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Citation: 
[Journal:] iBusiness [ISSN:] 2150-4083 [Volume:] 2 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Scientific Research Publishing [Place:] Wuhan [Year:] 2010 [Pages:] 255-267
Publisher: 
Scientific Research Publishing, Wuhan
Abstract: 
Theoretically economic growth could have negative effects over the growing economy when production expands for products the world demand for which is inelastic. If growth occurs in sectors and for products the world demand for which is elastic it could be expected that total revenues to domestic producers and exporters increase. Our goal is to prove that growth would be immiserizing only for products for which world demand is inelastic and expansion leads to a sizable worsening of the terms of trade. We show that there are few such commodities, namely food products and natural resources such as oil. Studying econometrically the demand function for Brazilian coffee as an example, we compare our estimation of the elasticity of demand for Brazil’s exports of green coffee with other research on the world elasticity of demand for green coffee. We conclude that for manufactured products the demand for which is highly elastic it is unlikely that exporting countries fall into immiserization, therefore, growth and further participation in global trade turn out to be quite beneficial. Our conclusion is that too much emphasis is put in economic theory and trade policy on the concept of immiserizing growth which is more of a theoretical possibility than a real-life problem.
Subjects: 
Immiserizing growth
Terms of trade
Elasticity of demand
International trade
JEL: 
F12
F43
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.