Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/148317
Authors: 
Gambardella, Christian
Pahle, Michael
Schill, Wolf-Peter
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
DIW Discussion Papers 1621
Abstract: 
Common intuition holds that retail real-time pricing (RTP) of electricity demand should become more beneficial in markets with high variable renewable energy (VRE) supply mainly due to increased price volatility. Using German market data, we test this intuition by simulating long-run electricity market equilibria with carbon-tax-induced VRE investment and real-time price responsive and nonresponsive consumption behavior. We find that the potential welfare gains from RTP are only partially explained by price volatility and are rather driven by opposing wholesale price effects caused by the technology portfolio changes from carbon taxation. Consequently, annual benefits from RTP actually change nonmonotonously with the carbon tax level, implying that increasing RTP at relatively high VRE shares can be both less and much more beneficial than without VRE supply. Nonetheless, as zero marginal cost supply becomes abundant with VRE entry, allocative efficiency increasingly depends on exposing more and more consumers to RTP.
Subjects: 
Real-time pricing
Electricity
Variable renewables
Carbon taxation
Welfare analysis
Partial equilibrium modeling
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.