Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/145339
Authors: 
Zoutman, Floris T.
Jacobs, Bas
Jongen, Egbert L. W.
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 16-032/VI
Abstract: 
The Netherlands has a unique tradition in which all major Dutch political parties provide CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis with highly detailed proposals for the tax-benefit system in every national election. This information allows us to quantitatively measure the redistributive preferences of political parties. For each political party we calculate social welfare weights by income level using the inverse optimal-tax method. We find that all political parties roughly give a higher social welfare weight to the poor than to the rich. Furthermore, left-wing parties attach higher social welfare weights to the poor and lower social welfare weights to the rich than right-wing parties do. However, we also discover two anomalies. First, all political parties give a much higher social welfare weight to middle incomes than to the working and non-working poor. Second, all Dutch political parties attach a slightly negative social welfare weight to the rich by setting top rates beyond the revenue-maximizing 'Laffer' rate. Finally, we detect a strong political status quo, since social welfare weights of all political parties hardly deviate from the welfare weights that are implied by the pre-existing tax-benefit system. We argue that political-economy considerations are key in understanding the political status quo and why middle-income groups are able to lower their tax burdens at the expense of both the low- and high-income groups.
Subjects: 
Inverse optimal-tax method
revealed social preferences
political parties
optimal taxation
income redistribution
JEL: 
C63
D63
H21
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
3.17 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.