Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/141597
Authors: 
Gerritsen, Sander
Webbink, Dinand
ter Weel, Bas
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 9838
Abstract: 
This paper investigates the empirical validity of the setup of a large-scale government neighbourhood investment programme in the Netherlands. Selection of neighbourhoods into the programme was determined by their score on a predetermined index. At first sight this is a textbook example for the application of a regression discontinuity (RD) design to estimate the causal effect of the programme on neighbourhood outcomes. However, at the discontinuity threshold we find a large gap in the share of non-Western immigrants. In addition, the pattern of non-compliance with the assignment rule is consistent with investing in neighbourhoods with a high share of non-Western immigrants. Finally, the way of selecting neighbourhoods into the programme could be a likely explanation for the imbalance at the discontinuity threshold. This case illustrates that RD designs can become invalid even when treatment and control groups have no influence on the assignment.
Subjects: 
regression discontinuity designs
government decision-making processes
neighbourhood investment programmes
JEL: 
C90
D70
R58
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
410.19 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.